East Lansing Wet Weather Resiliency Plan Virtual Open House
Welcome to the virtual open house for the East Lansing Wet Weather Resiliency Plan!
Click the arrows at the bottom of your screen to visit each section.
Use the navigation bar/menu to revisit any part of the meeting.
Leave your feedback any time on our Survey.
Pursuant to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and other nondiscrimination laws and authorities, the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability. Persons who require a reasonable accommodation based on language or disability should contact Kara Spinney at 855.712.8530 or kspinney@azdot.gov. Requests should be made as early as possible to ensure the State has an opportunity to address the accommodation.
De acuerdo con el Título VI de la Ley de Derechos Civiles de 1964, la Ley de Estadounidenses con Discapacidades (ADA por sus siglas en inglés) y otras normas y leyes antidiscriminatorias, el Departamento de Transporte de Arizona (ADOT) no discrimina por motivos de raza, color, origen nacional, sexo, edad o discapacidad. Las personas que requieran asistencia (dentro de lo razonable) ya sea por el idioma o discapacidad deben ponerse en contacto con Kara Spinney al 855.712.8530 o por correo electrónico al kspinney@azdot.gov. Las solicitudes deben hacerse lo más antes posible para asegurar que el Estado tenga la oportunidad de hacer los arreglos necesarios.
In recent years the City of East Lansing (City) has been impacted by multiple storm events that have resulted in flooding throughout many neighborhoods. Regional climate analyses for East Lansing indicates an increase in both the frequency and magnitude of short-duration, high-intensity precipitation events over the coming decades. In response to this growing risk, the City has initiated the development of a Wet Weather Resiliency Plan (WWRP or Plan). The Plan will provide a roadmap to reduce flood risk and create a safer, more flood-resilient city for residents, businesses, and visitors.
To inform the Plan, the City heard from community members through a series of engagement activities including in-person meetings and a survey to residents. These opportunities included options for residents to upload photos of flooding, ways to connect for immediate support, and provided educational information to help residents divert water away from their homes.
The City is now focused on prioritizing projects that will form the basis of future projects within the Wet Weather Resiliency Plan. The City hosted multiple focus groups with key stakeholders in November 2025 and June of this year.
Explore this Virtual Open House to learn more about vulnerable zones, how you can reduce flooding on your personal property, connect with the City, and provide feedback to support the City develop a Wet Weather Resiliency Plan that works for you!
The Wet Weather Resiliency Plan was envisioned by the City to be foundational in helping the community become more resilient to the changing climate conditions.
The Plan development process consisted of 11 total tasks, as shown on the right, that have been on-going since early 2024. This nearly two-and-a-half-year effort will conclude this fall. The community and stakeholders are currently being asked to provide feedback on the recommendations in the Plan related to flood risk reduction strategies, projects, costs, priorities and implementation efforts to inform the final plan. Feedback received will be incorporated into the final Plan, which will be presented for adoption by the City Council in September.
In August 2021, 7.22 inches of rainfall fell within the City in the span of 5 to 6 hours—an event deemed to be as rare as a 1,000-year storm. The event resulted in 227 reported incidents of flooding. Just a month later, in September 2021, the City saw 25 more reports of flooding, this time from a mere half-hour downpour of 1.25 inches. In 2024 two more severe rain events, one in June and another in July, would cause widespread flooding. The event in June dropped 5.2 inches in six hours, while the event in July, which was even more intense dropped 6.2 inches in three hours.
These events are a reminder of an uncertain future climate with the potential for increasing frequency of short but intense storms hitting our community. Rainfall like this is not unique to East Lansing as communities across the nation are grappling with the challenges of more frequent, high-intensity storms. In a proactive response, the City has initiated the development of a Wet Weather Resilience Plan (Plan) to find ways to mitigate flooding and safeguard its residents and visitors. As part of the Plan, the City and its consultant HDR have developed The City of East Lansing Changing Precipitation Conditions Report that incorporates the latest scientific analysis using historic and future climate change rainfall. The findings within the report will ensure that future investments as part of the Plan are functional and resilient to increasing rainfall patterns.
Historical Trending Analysis. The report analyzed historical rainfall trends using long-term rainfall data from 1949 to 2023 from the Lansing Airport. Over this period the trendline of annual precipitation in the East Lansing region increased approximately 30 percent (from 27 to 35 inches of rain). Likewise, the historical trends indicate that the intensity of rain events have also increased. For high intensity 1-hour duration rain events, historic trends indicate an almost 75 percent increase in rainfall from 1949 to 2023.
Engineering Design Storm Analysis. Engineers rely on prescribed engineering design storms to “right size” stormwater drainage systems. These events are the so called “10-year” or “100-year” rain events. Analysis within this report found that the engineering design storm estimates specifically for East Lansing developed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Agency, commonly referred to as Atlas-14 Rainfall Estimates, are over 10 years out of date. The engineering design storms were updated for the City using more recent rainfall data. Analysis indicates that by including more recent rainfall data the engineering design storm for the 1 though 25 year rain events all increase, indicating that smaller, more intense, and more frequent rain events are increasing in size.
Representative Storm Analysis. Using high resolution radar rainfall scans, twelve of the largest rain events that have impacted East Lansing in the past 30 years were analyzed for spatial patterns and timing of rainfall. Analysis from these historic rain events, referred to as “representative storms”, indicates that storms that result in flooding in East Lansing are often 3 to 18 hours in duration. Most of the rainfall of these events happens in fewer than 2 to 3 hours, with one hour peak intensities overwhelming City drainage system capacities. This indicates that short duration rain events should be a focus for the Plan.
Future Climate Change Analysis. The impact of future climate change was determined using state of the practice Global Climate Models specific to East Lansing. Climate change projections were determined for the years 2035, 2050, 2070, and 2100. Under a medium global climate change scenario, rainfall estimates are predicted to increase by eight percent by 2100. Under a high global climate change scenario, rainfall estimates are predicted to increase by 20 percent by 2100.
The flood model has ability to predict flood prone locations within the public rights-of-way, including depth of flooding and extents, and help City officials understand potential root causes related to the public drainage infrastructure. Future capital projects can also be inserted into the model to understand flood reduction benefits on the public drainage system. Results from the model will help inform the development of the Wet Weather Resilience Plan and prioritize future investments within our most vulnerable neighborhoods.
Below is an interactive map of flood prediction results extracted from model for the July 9, 2024 rain event that dropped over 6-inches of rain within parts of the City within 3 hours. Blue areas on the map show depth of predicted flooding within the City. Results from the flood model were used to confirm the accuracy of the model by comparing the results to survey responses and photos submitted by the public after the event.
Note: The flood prediction model is limited to public infrastructure only such as pipes and roadways. Results from the model do not represent private property flooding issues such as backyard flooding from clogged drains, misdirected roof downspouts, or groundwater seepage through foundations.
Results from the flood model were used to identify flood areas of concern. An area of concern was identified as an area that experienced road flooding of 6 inches or greater or building flooding during a present day 25-year, 1-hour storm event of 1.60 inches of rainfall. A total of 58 flood areas of concern were identified across the City.
The areas of concern were then put through a scoring and ranking system to identify which areas are the most impactful to residents, businesses, and City infrastructure. The scoring system used metrics such as number of buildings flooded, depth of flooding in the roadway, proximity to critical facilities such as fire and police stations, and risk for combined sewer backup. Based on the results, the areas were then categorized as either a High, Medium, and Low score for the purposes of the development of the Plan.
The map below highlights the highest scoring flood areas of concern, as identified through stakeholder feedback and the results from the flood model. The High scoring areas (shown in red) were selected by the City and stakeholders for the first round of concern areas that are being advanced for further project evaluations.
It should be noted that four areas received a High score but were not selected for additional evaluation under the Plan. These areas (shown as striped red lines) were not selected because they are already being addressed under an existing City project or are the responsibility of another government entity such as the County Drain Commissioner or Michigan Department of Transportation.
To develop a comprehensive WWRP for the City, it was critical that environmental justice and equity were layered into the development and prioritization of projects. The inclusion of social vulnerability data ensures that economically disadvantaged and historically underinvested areas are considered early and confirms that future capital investments do not neglect these areas. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) was used to identify and quantity social vulnerability across the City. The social vulnerability factors used to create the Social Vulnerability overlay in the map below center around the following four core themes:
The root cause of flooding in the flooding concern areas is due to lack of capacity in the City’s drainage infrastructure. The City’s pipes simply are not big enough to handle today’s storms. This is a common issue affecting many communities across the country due to climate change. During typical conditions, stormwater is collected in road catch basins, transported through the underground storm sewer system, and released to the Red Cedar River or county drain system. However, during extreme weather conditions, the capacity of the drainage system becomes overwhelmed, resulting in surface flooding and basement backups.
Historically, the existing drainage infrastructure was designed to handle a 10-year design storm. However, due to climate change, today’s 10-year design storm is larger, which is why flooding is more commonly occurring during short duration, high intensity storm events. The Wet Weather Resiliency Plan addresses this by defining two Level of Service (LOS) goals that are representative of the storm events experienced by the City today. The below graphic demonstrates how the LOS has evolved as part the Plan.
Level of service (LOS) refers to the performance target for new and upgraded public drainage systems. The LOS is commonly measured by the “design storm” conveyed, which considers the frequency (probability of occurrence each year) and the magnitude (inches of rain) of a storm event. For example, the LOS of a drainage system may be defined as a 10-year storm, which is a storm that has a 10 percent chance of occurring any given year at a magnitude of 2.00 inches or more in 1 hour.
The WWRP includes updated and increasing rainfall depth due to climate change.
Previous Level of Service was 10-year, 1-hour design storm including 2.61 inches of rainfall
Current Level of Service goal is 10-year, 1-hour design storm including 2.00 inches of rainfall
Enhanced Level of Service goal is 50-year, 1-hour design storm including 2.54 inches of rainfall. The 56-year, 1-hour design storm is equivalent to a 16-year, 1-hour design storm in the year 2100.
A mixture of strategies are needed to increase the Level of Service of the drainage system. Four key flood risk mitigation strategies were considered in the development of projects. Within the combined sewer system areas, sewer separation to remove storm water, is the City’s preferred strategy over combined sewer upsizing. Additionally, opportunities to add green infrastructure storage systems to slow down the flow of water to the Red Cedar River were incorporated where land is available. Remaining combined sewer systems will be evaluated after separation to determine if remaining bottlenecks still need to be addressed. This will be done in future phases.
How This Strategy Works
How This Strategy Works
How This Strategy Works
How This Strategy Works
Community representatives indicated a strong desire for green infrastructure to be incorporated into the alternatives. As a result, several opportunities for green infrastructure and storage facilities were identified, mainly from available City-controlled properties. In general, privately owned parcels were not studied extensively for green infrastructure and storage opportunities because of a lack of property control to easily implement projects.
The potential green infrastructure and storage are located at:
Rendering of what the aboveground storage at Harrison Meadows park, west of Abbot road, could look like.
Rendering of what an underground storage would look like at Valley Court Park. The surface above the storage would be fully restored with grass, trees, and plants following construction.
Within the High-ranking flood areas of concern, concept level flood mitigation project alternatives have been identified and evaluated. Evaluations followed a two-step process:
Identify conceptual flood mitigation project alternatives within each area and insert into the flood model to understand flood reduction benefits.
Using the results from Step 1, score and rank each project alternative using a project prioritization framework. Select the highest-ranking projects for inclusion into the recommended Plan.
The Project Prioritization Framework was developed in conjunction with the City and public stakeholders who consist of various neighborhood community groups and non-City government entities. The Project Prioritization Framework consists of eight (8) criteria for evaluating projects as part of the Plan. These criteria are shown below. The relative importance of each criteria, referred to as its “Weight”, was determined by using a pairwise scoring approach. A pairwise scoring approach allows the City to understand which criteria matters most to the community when it comes to evaluating projects. A higher weight means that criteria is more important. For example, the highest weighted criteria is “Improved Drainage” with a Weight of 16.5%, while the lowest weighted criteria is “Ease of Constructability” with a Weight of 7.9%. This means that Improved Drainage carries over double the importance as compared to Constructability when evaluating and selecting projects that will be included in the recommended Plan.
In addition to the Criteria, the City has stressed the importance of environmental justice and equity as part of the overall development of the Plan. Analyses have incorporated social vulnerability using publicly available US Census metrics. This data was analyzed to understand where the most vulnerable areas in the City are located and will be factored into the project prioritization and selection.
How do you feel about the Criteria and weights? Please consider submitting feedback by filling out the Survey by clicking on the Feedback webpage on the left panel.
The degree to which drainage is improved to reduce flood risk.
Weight: 16.5%
How aligned the Plan is with the City’s Combined Sewer Overflow elimination goals or ability to design project with water quality treatment features.
Weight: 15.5%
Focusing the City on projects that impact a higher total number of people or a high-visibility project.
Weight: 14.9%
How aligned with City’s resiliency initiatives will relate to green stormwater management and infrastructure.
Weight: 13.0%
Focusing the City on projects that will reduce unnecessary impervious surfaces (cement or other non-draining surfaces).
Weight: 11.8%
Focusing the City on projects that will reduce unnecessary impervious surfaces (cement or other non-draining surfaces).
Weight: 11.8%
How easy it is to maintain.
Weight: 9.4%
How easy is it to build and implement.
Weight: 7.9%
Through a series of workshops and discussions with the City, a set of projects were selected to be prioritized and implemented in the Wet Weather Resiliency Plan. The following projects are a combination of several flood risk mitigation strategies, aimed at reducing flooding risk in the top eight concern areas.
Each project was scored against the eight (8) criteria in the community-driven project prioritization framework. Based on this framework, the projects were ranked by their total prioritization score, which reflects the needs and wants of the community.
LOS Goal: Current 50-year/Future 16-year
This project would separate stormwater from the sewer mains and offload the stormwater to the Red Cedar River. It includes the upsizing of existing combined sewer lines to relieve remaining bottlenecks, and the construction of new combined mains. This project also includes the construction of underground stormwater storage facilities at Gordon Guyer Park and Glencairn Park.
LOS Goal: Current 10-year
This project would separate stormwater from the sewer mains and offload the stormwater to the Red Cedar River. This will require the construction of a storm main to convey the separated stormwater. Upsizing the existing combined sewer line along Valley Court, Hillcrest Avenue, Elm Place, and Elm Street and adding new combined sewers will help to relieve remaining bottlenecks. This project also includes the construction of underground stormwater storage facility at Valley Court Park.
LOS Goal: Current 50-year/Future 16-year
This project would separate stormwater from the sewer mains and offload the stormwater to Ranney Park. This will require the construction of a storm main to convey the separated stormwater. Upsizing existing combined sewer lines along Glenmoor Road and Oakridge Avenue and adding new combined sewers will help to relieve remaining bottlenecks.
LOS Goal: Current 10-year
This project includes the upsizing of existing storm pipes to relieve bottlenecks in the area. It also includes stormwater storage opportunities at Albert A. White Memorial Park through the expansion of an existing fishing pond.
LOS Goal: Current 10-year
This project includes the upsizing of existing storm pipes to relieve bottlenecks in the area. It also includes stormwater storage opportunities at Harrison Meadow Park and in an open lot at the Fire Department.
Below is an interactive map showing the location and key components of each project. Additionally, the map shows adjacent concern areas that receive flood risk reduction benefits because of the hydraulic connectivity of East Lansing’s drainage system.
Several non-structural strategies are under consideration by the City to complement the structural strategies (projects) recommended. These strategies target primary needs such as funding and impervious-surface reduction, both of which were topics of discussion during the stakeholder focus groups.
A stormwater utility study would explore creating a stormwater utility to support the implementation of both structural and nonstructural strategies. This directly addresses funding and has proved to be successful in other areas impacted by surface flooding. Inclusion of a stormwater credit program for property owner fee reductions should be considered to encourage stormwater management best practices to reduce runoff and/or improve water quality.
Funding
Asset Management
Continue the City’s existing Property Owner Assistance Program for Basement Backup Protection that provides financial reimbursement for installation of backflow preventers.
Private Property Protection
Resiliency
Review and modify current design and development standards for streets, bike lanes, sidewalks, and pathways that create additional impervious surfaces to incorporate current best practices for reducing hard-surface construction and incorporating green infrastructure.
Impervious-Surface Reduction
Additional Green Infrastructure
A pay-in-lieu program allows developers to satisfy stormwater requirements through a fee payment when on-site compliance is impractical, while providing the City with a dedicated funding source for larger, watershed-scale stormwater improvements that can deliver equivalent or greater benefits.
Updating post-construction standards (e.g., design storm, small site development, minimum requirements/credits) for resiliency.
This strategy would explore implementing a program specifically aimed at reducing the amount of impervious surfaces. More green infrastructure would improve drainage across the City.
Partnering with other City departments and nonprofit groups in the area would provide benefits across several areas, such as wetlands, trails, parks, etc.
Providing additional staff and technical resources to residents and business owners on private property flood risk mitigation strategies.
Develop enhanced GIS mapping of private drainage system infrastructure built by developers to document new systems and promote their active asset management and coordination with adjacent systems.
Prioritize the proactive implementation of active stormwater management measures on City-controlled sites when other improvements are planned and implemented.
While the City plans and prioritizes projects to address flooding in public systems, residents can also take steps to reduce contributions to the storm sewer system and their homes.
All of these stormwater tips can help protect your home from flooding, either directly by preventing the pooling of runoff in your yard, or indirectly by reducing your contribution to the storm sewer and therefore lessening the burden on the system. But there are other ways to protect your home against water damage from heavy rain.
It’s also important to share these ideas with your neighbors and support investment in our local infrastructure. If residents, businesses, and municipalities work together to reduce stormwater runoff and improve both our public and private wet weather infrastructure, we can be better prepared for intense rain events in the future. Visit MyWatersheds.org to learn about how communities in Greater Lansing and throughout the country are managing their stormwater challenges and how you can help at home.
It’s also important to share these ideas with your neighbors and support investment in our local infrastructure. If residents, businesses, and municipalities work together to reduce stormwater runoff and improve both our public and private wet weather infrastructure, we can be better prepared for intense rain events in the future. Visit MyWatersheds.org to learn about how communities in Greater Lansing and throughout the country are managing their stormwater challenges and how you can help at home.
Basement Flooding and Sewer Backup
Information
Basement Flooding & Sewer Backup Information | East
Lansing, MI - Official Website
Basement Flooding Brochure
Basement Flooding Brochure PDF
Sewer Backup Dos and Dont
Sewer Backup Do's & Don'ts | East Lansing, MI -
Official Website
Heavy Rains and Backup Drains
Heavy Rains and Backed-up Drains PDF
The implementation of the recommended structural and non-structural strategies will be a long, iterative process. For each project or program, available funding must be identified to support the necessary capital, programmatic and operation and maintenance investments.
The implementation of the WWRP and the recommended structural and non-structural strategies included will require ongoing collaboration between the City and neighborhood residents for open and inclusive stakeholder engagement during all phases of implementation.
This implementation plan follows the order of prioritized alternatives and provides a brief justification for sequencing and phasing the capital projects that comprise each alternative for implementation. This plan also identifies proposed funding sources, such as the Clean Water State Revolving Fund (SRF), where currently known, and the estimated costs of the proposed capital projects, although these are subject to change. The costs are presented in 2026 dollars and have not been escalated to future-year dollars.
| Project Name | Priority Rank | Phase 1 Cost | Phase 2 Cost | Phase 3 Cost | Phase 4 Cost | Phase 5 Cost | Total Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Downtown Neighborhoods Combined Sewer Relief (Harrison Street route) | 1 | $54.9Million | $25.8Million | $26.9Million | $21.3Million | $30.3Million | $160Million |
| Valley Court Corridor Combined Sewer Relief | 2 | $30.8Million | $15.6Million | $4.9Million | $3.9Million | No cost | $56Million |
| West Central Neighborhoods Combined Sewer Relief | 3 | $11.7Million | $14.7Million | $12.2Million | $4.3Million | No cost | $43Million |
| Whitehills Drainage Improvement | 4 | $0.5Million | $9.7Million | No cost | No cost | No cost | $11Million |
| Abbot and Saginaw Storm Drainage Improvements | 5 | $13.5Million | $24.4Million | No cost | No cost | No cost | $39Million |
| Total Cost | $309Million | ||||||
Below is an interactive map showing the location and key components of each project. To view more detailed information for each project, please click on the boundary you want to learn more about.
We will also share the Plan's findings with the community at the City Council Discussion Only Meeting on September 15 at 6:00 p.m. at the Hannah Community Center, 819 Abbot Road, East Lansing, MI 48823.
In addition to the Council meeting, we encourage you to complete the survey on the right. We welcome your unique insights on the Plan for creating a more flood resilient East Lansing.
1800 E State Rd, East Lansing, MI 48823
Phone:
517-337-9459
Public Works & Environmental Services | East Lansing,
MI - Official Website